An alarming report from the Empire Center for Public Policy reveals that around 3 million New Yorkers enrolled in Medicaid or the state-run Essential Plan may not actually qualify for these programs. This finding raises serious questions about the efficiency of New York’s health insurance system and its impact on taxpayers. In 2025, New York is projected to spend a staggering $113 billion on these two programs, yet one-third of those receiving benefits might be ineligible.
According to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, only 5.5 million New Yorkers had incomes low enough to qualify for coverage last year, but there were a total of 8.5 million people using the state’s health insurance programs. This discrepancy suggests that many individuals who are enrolled do not meet the necessary income requirements. The Essential Plan, which was created under the Affordable Care Act in 2015, is particularly generous as it allows families with incomes up to 250% above the poverty level to enroll—an allowance that no other state offers.
The financial implications are significant. On average, covering a nondisabled adult costs these programs about $6,600 annually. With an estimated 3 million people potentially unqualified for coverage, taxpayers are footing a bill of approximately $20 billion each year just for those who should not be enrolled at all. This burden is shared between state and federal governments.
It’s worth noting that around 44% of New Yorkers rely on either Medicaid or the Essential Plan for their healthcare needs, with this figure rising to 60% in New York City alone. No other state has enrollment rates exceeding 37% for similar plans, highlighting how uniquely reliant New York is on government health insurance.
Over the past decade, while an additional 3.7 million people signed up for these plans, only a modest reduction of about 1.2 million uninsured residents occurred in New York. The Empire Center points out that this indicates most new enrollees were likely individuals who would have found coverage through other means if not for these government programs.
New York allocates a substantial portion—28%—of its budget toward health insurance each year. Critics argue that Medicaid was originally intended to support those unable to afford private insurance rather than serving nearly half of a state’s population.
In reflecting on this situation, one critical quote stands out: “A generation ago, both major political parties would have viewed growing Medicaid rolls as a problem to be solved—a sign of rising poverty and social dysfunction and an unwelcome burden on taxpayers.” Now it seems leaders celebrate record-high enrollment as progress toward universal coverage instead of addressing underlying issues within the system.
The need for reform in how applicants are screened cannot be overstated if we want to ensure that resources are directed towards those truly in need rather than perpetuating inefficiencies that cost taxpayers dearly.
What do you think about this situation? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!
Source: Steadfast Nation
Leave a Comment